How to Run a Galxe or Zealy Quest Campaign

What should a Galxe or Zealy quest campaign achieve?

A quest campaign turns a defined project goal into participant actions, eligibility rules and a reward process. Before choosing tasks, decide what you want participants to understand, try or contribute, and how the team will recognize completion.

A useful objective is specific enough to guide task design. For example, a project introducing a product may want participants to explore its documentation and demonstrate understanding; a community initiative may focus on constructive contributions. These are different goals and call for different evidence and review effort.

Write a short campaign brief before opening either platform. Include:

• Audience: who the tasks are intended for and any eligibility boundaries.
• Outcome: what participants should know, test or contribute.
• Action: what a participant must do, described in plain language.
• Evidence: what the team or platform can use to assess completion.
• Reward: what is offered, how eligibility is decided and how delivery works.

Keep the campaign limited to actions that support the objective. If a task creates little value beyond a public social signal, reconsider it or pair it with a more meaningful action. For broader community planning, see quest campaign services and the community growth and engagement overview.

How do you choose between Galxe and Zealy?

Choose Galxe or Zealy by the participant journey and the verification you can operate. Compare the actual options available to your project on each platform, then select the one that makes the campaign easiest to understand and administer.

Start with the work participants need to do. If the campaign is organized around a short sequence of defined actions, map those actions to the platform’s available task and completion settings. If the campaign is intended to support ongoing community participation, check whether the experience can accommodate repeat engagement without making the rules hard to follow. Do not assume that the same task or proof method is available in both places; confirm the current setup in the project account before committing to a design.

Use this practical comparison:

Then test the participant flow from the campaign page through the final task. Confirm that the project name, task instructions and reward terms are consistent. For a related distribution plan, see the guide to running an airdrop campaign.

How should you design quest tasks and completion evidence?

A well-designed task states the action, the evidence required and the reason the action matters. Participants should be able to tell what counts as completion before they begin, while reviewers should be able to apply the same standard across submissions.

Draft each task using a compact specification:

• Instruction: use a direct verb and describe the expected action.
• Purpose: explain how the action relates to the campaign objective.
• Evidence: name what the participant must provide or what the available platform verification can check.
• Decision rule: state how the team will handle incomplete, unclear or repeated submissions.
• Reward condition: connect completion to the published eligibility terms.

Prefer actions that demonstrate learning, product use or a useful contribution over a long list of low-effort signals. If a task asks participants to share content, explain the acceptable format and any disclosure expectations. For a knowledge task, make sure the answer tests understanding rather than asking people to repeat promotional language.

Before launch, ask someone who did not write the tasks to follow them without extra explanation. Record every point where the instructions are ambiguous, then revise the copy and evidence standard. Keep a copy of the approved task wording and review criteria. That record gives moderators and campaign owners a consistent reference when questions arise during the campaign.

How can you reduce Sybil participation without blocking genuine users?

Anti-Sybil planning means setting fair eligibility checks and a review process before rewards are at stake. No single signal should be treated as proof of a person’s intent; combine proportionate checks with clear rules and a way to resolve disputed decisions.

First, decide which eligibility conditions are necessary for the campaign. They may relate to a participant’s actions, account or wallet, but should be tied to the stated objective and disclosed in advance. Use only checks that the team can explain and administer. Avoid collecting personal information simply because it might be useful; specify what is needed, who can access it and how it will be handled.

Prepare a review protocol that covers:

• how the team will assess a submission against the published criteria;
• how repeated or inconsistent entries will be reviewed;
• who can approve an exception or a second look;
• how participants can ask for clarification or raise an appeal;
• how review decisions will be recorded without exposing sensitive information.

Keep the tone neutral in participant-facing rules. Explain that eligibility is assessed against the campaign terms, and do not imply that a wallet or social action alone proves unique identity. If identity checks are essential, explain the requirement and its implications before people join, rather than adding it after participation has started.

What reward rules should participants see before joining?

Reward terms should tell participants what is available, what they must do to qualify and how the project will handle distribution. Publish the rules alongside the tasks so that eligibility is not reinterpreted after people have completed their work.

Make the terms operational, not promotional. State the reward type, who may qualify, how completion will be assessed, how selected participants will be notified and what information is needed to receive the reward. If the reward depends on a review, say so. If there is a cap, a selection process or a closing point, explain it in plain language before launch. Do not imply that task completion means automatic receipt unless that is how the campaign is actually configured.

Before publishing, check that the reward plan is feasible for the team responsible for delivery. Confirm the funding or inventory, access to the distribution method, ownership of participant support and the process for handling an incorrect wallet or an unclaimed reward. Set a secure internal approval path for any transfer of project assets. Keep participant records to the minimum needed for eligibility and fulfillment.

A good final test is to ask whether a participant could answer these questions from the campaign page alone: What can I receive? What makes me eligible? When and how will the team decide? What should I do if something goes wrong? If any answer is unclear, revise the terms before inviting participants.

What should the campaign team prepare and report?

A campaign is ready to launch when the task flow, review ownership and reward process have all been checked together. Assign a named owner for participant communication and another accountable reviewer if the campaign requires manual decisions.

A practical operating sequence is to approve the brief, test the participant journey, publish the campaign, monitor questions, review completion evidence and reconcile eligible rewards. Keep a record of changes to task wording or terms; if a change affects eligibility, communicate it clearly rather than applying it silently to existing submissions.

Prepare these materials:

• approved campaign objective, audience and task copy;
• evidence standards and a reviewer decision guide;
• participant-facing eligibility, reward and appeal terms;
• a support response for common questions;
• a reward fulfillment checklist and approval owner;
• a closing report template.

The report should distinguish participation from completed, reviewed and eligible actions. Summarize recurring questions, ambiguous tasks, rejected submissions by reason and reward status. This gives the team a basis for improving the next campaign without presenting raw participation as proof of lasting community value. For ongoing support, compare this guide with quest campaign services, or review the pricing guide for Galxe and Zealy campaigns.

What can Galxe or Zealy change after you prepare the campaign?

A sound plan reduces avoidable confusion, but the team should verify the live campaign in Galxe or Zealy before inviting participants. Check the final page, task settings and reward language against the approved brief, and keep a record of the version that went live.

The platforms control their own product interfaces, review decisions and applicable policies; availability or presentation of a campaign can therefore change outside the project team’s control. Neither the campaign designer nor the project can promise a particular platform review outcome or continued placement, so plan communications around the work and reward terms you control.

For a final quality check, confirm that:

• the public instructions match the approved task and eligibility wording;
• each evidence requirement can be assessed by the assigned reviewer;
• the support contact and appeal route are visible;
• reward inventory and approvals are ready before distribution;
• the reporting owner can reconcile campaign activity with decisions.

MegaSatoshi uses a named campaign readiness review to compare the brief, participant journey, eligibility rules and fulfillment checklist before launch. To request support, send MegaSatoshi your campaign objective, preferred platform, draft tasks and reward plan; the team can then identify the decisions to settle before production.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Set the objectiveDescribe the participant outcome and the audience the campaign is intended to serve. Use that objective to exclude tasks that do not contribute to it.
2. Map tasks to evidenceWrite each instruction with a completion standard and review method. Confirm that the selected platform supports the setup you intend to use.
3. Approve eligibility and rewardsPublish qualification, review, appeal and fulfillment terms before launch. Assign owners for participant questions and reward approvals.
4. Test the participant journeyReview the live campaign as a participant and compare every page with the approved brief. Resolve unclear instructions before promotion.
5. Review and reportAssess submissions consistently, record reward decisions and summarize what participants completed, where they needed help and what to improve.